RightTurns.com - Columnists | |
ARTHUR
BRUZZONE
|
A televised election debate -- actually, the only televised
debate during the recent California gubernatorial campaign --
captured a revealing picture of the American political male.
A feminized Democrat, Cruz Bustamante, like a subservient husband
beaten down for years, could only repeat annoyingly "Yes,
Ariana," in response to attacks on his record by candidate
Ariana Huffington. But macho man Schwartzenegger reacted without
hesitation to the taunts of an aggressive Ariana Huffington. He
counterattacked, smiling, enjoying the counterpunches, confident
in his superiority. He had the unmistakable look of an alpha male.
Off stage, former governor Gray Davis waited. Davis is a
prototype Democrat feminized male. He, like Bustamante, talks
softly, low key; his gestures are tentative and quieted. He too
"feels the people's pain." Well, not quite enough, it
turns out. But like his fellow feminized colleagues, beneath the
service, Davis is a vicious hot-tempered abuser of staff and
especially women. And this is the pattern of feminized males in
politics.
Whether its Davis, former President Bill Clinton, Former Senate
Majority Leader Tom Daschle, they share common feminized
characteristics. Their voices are restrained, usually not deep;
they have choreographed their soft spoken expressions. They work
to maintain a permanent smile. They appear sensitive and non-aggressive.
They are the 'new man,' beyond primal aggressiveness. Sure!
In reality, their tempers are violent, and their treatment of
women boldly disrespectful. Clinton's temper was notorious. Only
one photo was taken of Clinton's in a violent temper tantrum,
attacking a journalist. That picture is unavailable on the
internet. But his temper tantrums were well known.
Most democrats are still embarrassed by Tom Daschle's violent
diatribe on the night he gave up the U.S. Senate Majority
position to Republican Trent Lott.
But it is the treatment of women that is so grossly hypocritical
of the new feminized democrats.
The feminized male feigns sensitivity and a special bond with
women. Feminized politicians like Clinton and Davis appear to be
sensitive. Even groping and physical abuse is forgiven by their
supporters. Such is the case for these two. Women voters
overlooked the sexual groping and attacks of Clinton; they turned
away from the accounts of physical and emotional abuse by Davis
of his staff members.
De-feminized male Schwartzenegger was accused of groping. He
responded directly - an immediate acknowledgement and apology. He
responded to all Democrat last minute attacks similarly. Directly.
Unlike many other Republican candidates, his turned his defense
into a counterattack, labeling the Dem's attacks "puke
politics.' His campaign style, his personality and internal
stamina are precisely the opposite of the feminized male. Call it
the dreaded trait of 'masculinity.'
George W. Bush began as a mildly feminized male. He was you will
recall by self-admission, a compassionate conservative. He didn't
intellectualize concerns for the poor, especially for students
left behind. He felt it and projected deep concern. It was a
stunning reinterpretation of conservatism and it was effective.
The President was able to build a bi-partisan coalition and pass
significant, performance-based educational reforms.
But the 2001 terrorist attacks changed Bush. His response to the
terrorist attacks was not introspective, not apologetic, not self-reflecting.
His response was to exteriorize, retaliate, be aggressive, bold,
and confident. Bush was de-feminized. On the other hand, most
democrats wallowed in their feminized responses, questioning the
war, questioning the need for aggressive response; they tried to
empathize with our enemies, seek to understand the enemy's rage,
avoided offending or aggravating.
The strength of the family and the nation depend on renewing the
virtues of a masculine male. This is not an attack against
effeminate behavior, which is for the most part inherited. Both
feminization and de-feminization require effort. Restoring
masculinity to the American male is to demand a return to the
acquired virtues of courage, determination, resoluteness,
defending oneself and one's family, friends and nation. In
military affairs, it is the restoration of aggressive
counterattack; in domestic affairs, unwavering belief in enacted
initiatives.
The recent victory of Arnold Schwartzenegger was a dramatic step.
He epitomizes the defeminized male. Schwartzenegger dominated the
world of muscle building, he dominated the Hollywood of action
heroes, and now he dominated over not one, but two feminized
democrats, Gray Davis and Cruz Bustamante.
Now he must deal with one of the Democrat's last red-blooded
alpha males, California State Senate Speaker John Burton. Burton
champions the causes of the poor; but he does it ruthlessly and
viciously. At least he wears no masks. Nor does Howard Dean, the
leading Democrat presidential candidate.
So, we are returning to brute politics, with a purity and
directness that has been missing. Politicians have been
triangulating, accommodating and appropriating. Let the battles
surge; ideas against ideas, passion versus passion, and straight
forward attack and counterattack. The world has become too
dangerous for feminized males. It's a luxury our families and our
nation can't afford. Our enemies are brutal and heartless. The
time for feeling our enemies pain is long gone. Our enemy's
aggression has rekindled the masculinity in our leaders,
fortunately, for all of us.
Write to Arthur at bruzzone@rightturns.com
Arthur Bruzzone has written over 250 political articles for national and regional media, and has commented on political and urban issues for American and European television and radio networks. He is an award-winning public affairs television producer/host.His articles and columns have appeared in the Wall Street Journal, San Francisco Chronicle, San Francisco Examiner, Campaign & Elections Magazine, among other publications. Mr. Bruzzone holds a Masters Degree in Philosophy from C.U.A in Washington , D.C., and a M.B.A. in real estate. He is a returned Peace Corps volunteer serving two years in the Kingdom of Tonga, and the former chair of the San Francisco Republican Party. He is president of a real estate investment company headquartered in San Francisco, CA.
© 2003 RightTurns.com
All Rights Reserved